Media and digital literacies in Canadian teacher educators’ open educational practices: A post-intentional phenomenologyMain MenuWelcomethis is the starting point and gateway into this PhD dissertation documentBeginninggeneral introduction to this dissertationLiterature Reviewintroduction to the literature review and outlines purpose for theoretical and conceptual frameworksResearch Designoutlines the sequence for the research design - methodology, methods, validity, ethicsData Analysis and Findingsthis is the introduction to the data analysis chapter of the dissertationDiscussionthis is the discussion of the data and analysis reflecting the research conducted for this dissertationConclusionthis page introduces the conclusion of this dissertationReferencesthis is a page describing how the references are organized in this documentAppendiceslist and links to appendices in this dissertationhjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06HJ.DeWaard
AML Media Triangle and Key Concepts
12022-11-12T18:03:50+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea0621link to web page outlining the Association for Media Literacy key concepts and questionsplain2022-11-12T18:03:50+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06
Contents of this tag:
12022-06-08T20:48:43+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06Media Literacy21defines and describes relevant concepts relating to media literaciesplain2023-10-02T12:51:15+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06
This page is referenced by:
12022-06-08T20:48:43+00:00Media Literacy8defines and describes relevant concepts relating to media literaciesplain2022-11-12T18:09:02+00:00Media literacy, from an autonomous stance, is defined as the ability to access, analyze, use, create, and evaluate information using a variety of communication formats (Baker, 2016; Hobbs, 2019; Rogow, 2019). The process of critical inquiry and reflection are central to being media literate (Grizzle et al., 2013) since “media literate people apply their skills to all symbol-based communication, irrespective of message” (Rogow, 2019, p. 122). These messages are bound by the types of media texts (print, visual, audio, digital) used to create and communicate (Baker, 2016; Hobbs, 2017). Media literacy involves examining the semiotics and symbolism of text messages as part of a meaning-making inquiry (Gee, 2015). The Association for Media Literacy provides a framework outlining eight essential concepts, further described in a triangle, that can guide understandings about medial literacy. This framework may be helpful in this research. From an ideological stance, media literacy shifts beyond encoding and decoding media texts to engage in meaning making within socially, politically, and culturally contextualized media consumption and production spaces (Baker, 2016; Hobbs, 2017; Hoechsmann, 2019; Hoechsmann & Poyntz, 2012). Media literacy is a process of becoming (Gee, 2017) that is networked (Ito et al., 2010; West-Puckett et al., 2018), participatory (Jenkins et al., 2009), discursive (Gee, 2015), and complicated (boyd, 2010). Within teacher education, these media literacy processes may be evident in the lived experiences of MDL that occurs with the OEPr of teacher educators. UNESCO combines media and information literacies (MIL) into a singular concept that encompasses and combines with a range of literacies such as computer, internet, digital, library, news, media and information literacies. This MIL framework outlines five laws of MIL (Grizzle & Singh, n.d.) that are presented in a matrix with three components (access, evaluate, create) and includes competencies and performance indicators that can be applied to individual teacher's practices and FoE at the organizational level.