Media and digital literacies in Canadian teacher educators’ open educational practices: A post-intentional phenomenology

Literacies

Literacy is a human process of making sense of our world, binding our understanding and relationships to each other and our contexts using symbols and communication technologies. Literacy is found in the “relationship between human practices and the production, distribution, exchange, refinement, negotiation and contestation of meaning” (Lankshear & Knobel, 2007, p. 2). Within this relationship building process there is a reciprocity between practice and meaning-making, between context and language, and between reading and writing (Lankshear & Knobel, 2007).

          Stordy (2015) examined literacy/ literacies, grounded in the works of Gee (2009), Kress (2010), Lankshear and Knobel (2007), Street (2003), and The New London Group (1996) to create a taxonomy that encompassed a multitude of definitions and variations of relevant terms. This taxonomy included both an autonomous perspective outlining psychological cognitive definitions and an ideological perspective relating to socio-cultural approaches that explicates distinctions initially made by Street (2013) when defined literacy/literacies. Stordy (2015) differentiated these into those literacies that integrated no-or-few digital technologies (conventional), those that incorporated new technical elements (peripheral), and those literacies that assimilated new technical stuff with new ‘ethos stuff’ (paradigm), further described in the Taxonomy of Literacies (see Figure 9).

          The taxonomy was grounded in literacy research and provided a working definition of literacies that “captures the complementary nature of literacy as a cognitive ability and a social practice” (Stordy, 2015, p. 472). While Stordy (2015) acknowledged the challenges and limitations of this framework, and recognized that the borders between these concepts were fuzzy and permeable, this taxonomy supported the reframing of literacies in a way that clarified understanding necessary for this research. What isn't included in this definition is the entanglement of literacy practices with cultural capital or cultural awareness. I acknowledge the intentional omission of conceptions of neutrality or power structures inherent within the social and political values often attached to literacy/literacies practices (Frau-Meigs, 2017).

          Literacy terminology is frequently confused or conflated with notions of skills, fluency and competency. For this research, I regarded these as different conceptions (see Figure 10). Fluencies encompass the ability to speak, read, and write in a given language quickly and easily, while competency is defined by having skills and abilities to do a job (“Competency,” OED Online; “Fluency,” OED Online). These definitions are not the same thing, but can be considered to be subsumed within the broader term of literacy. This clarification is made here since research applies these terms interchangeably, yet they are distinctly different conceptions (see Figure 10).
 

Contents of this path: