References
Alevizou, G. (2015). From OER to MOOCs: Critical perspectives on the historical mediation trajectories of open education. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 11(2), 203–224.
Antoninis, M. (2019, March 5). Digital literacy skills: From a framework to a measure [Blog]. Retrieved July 21, 2019, from UNESCO website: http://uis.unesco.org/en/blog/digital-literacy-skills-framework-measure
Archer, M. S. (2008, June). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Retrieved from http://www.journaldumauss.net/IMG/article_PDF/article_362.pdf
Armellini, A., & Nie, M. (2013). Open educational practices for curriculum enhancement. Open Learning, 28(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.796286
Atchoarena, D., Selwyn, N., Chakroun, B., Miao, F., West, M., & de Coligny, C. (2017). Working group on education: Digital skills for life and work. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259013
Baker, F. (2016). Media literacy in the K-12 classroom (2nd ed.). ISTE.
Barrett, M. J. (2014). Responding to environmental crises through multi-media hypertextual research representation. In M. A. Peters, E. P. Hart, & A. Reid (Eds.), A Companion to Research in Education (pp. 569–574). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bates, T. (2019a, May 30). The coming crisis in Canadian post-secondary education: 3 – Some strategies for survival. Retrieved October 9, 2019, from Contact North: Online Learning and Distance Education Resources website: https://www.tonybates.ca/2019/05/30/the-coming-crisis-in-canadian-post-secondary-education-3-some-strategies-for-survival/
Bates, T. (2019b, May 30). The Coming Crisis in Canadian Post-secondary Education: 3 – Some strategies for survival | Tony Bates. Retrieved June 7, 2019, from https://www.tonybates.ca/2019/05/30/the-coming-crisis-in-canadian-post-secondary-education-3-some-strategies-for-survival/
Bayne, S., Knox, J., & Ross, J. (2015). Open education: The need for a critical approach. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1065272
Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 98–118.
Belshaw, D. (2012, July 12). On the important differences between literacies, skills and competencies. Retrieved August 10, 2019, from Open Educational Thinkering website: https://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2012/07/12/on-the-important-differences-between-literacies-skills-and-competencies/
Bozkurt, A., Koseoglu, S., & Singh, L. (2019). An analysis of peer reviewed publications on openness in education in half a century: Trends and patterns in the open hemisphere. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4). Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/4252/1564
Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08329699
Buss, R. R., Foulger, T. S., Wetzel, K., & Lindsey, L. (2018). Preparing teachers to integrate technology into K–12 instruction II: Examining the effects of technology-infused methods courses and student teaching. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(3), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1437852
Carr, P., Hoechsmann, M., & Thesee, G. (Eds.). (2018). Democracy 2.0: Media, political literacy and critical engagement. Boston: Brill Sense.
Carretero Gomez, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use (No. EUR 28558 EN). Retrieved from Publications Office of the European Union website: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/digcomp-21-digital-competence-framework-citizens-eight-proficiency-levels-and-examples-use
Choi, M., Cristol, D., & Gimbert, B. (2018). Teachers as digital citizens: The influence of individual backgrounds, internet use and psychological characteristics on teachers’ levels of digital citizenship. Computers & Education, 121, 143–161.
Clandinin, D. J. (2015). Stories to live by on the professional knowledge landscape. Waikato Journal of Education, Special 20th Edition Anniversary Collection, 183–193.
Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & Ming, F. H. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00014-0
Couros, A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 109–127). Athabasca University Press.
Covey, D. T. (2013). Opening the Dissertation: Overcoming Cultural Calcification and Agoraphobia. TripleC, 11(2), 543–557.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in open educational practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127–143.
Cronin, Catherine. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3096/4301
Daviet, B. (2016). Revisiting the principle of education as a public good. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245306
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Retrieved June 18, 2018, from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077800416681864
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2013). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing Inc.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The Sage Handbook of qualitative research (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dewey, J. (1916). Chapter 7: The democratic conception in education. In Democracy and Education (pp. 85–104). Pennsylvania: Penn State.
Dixon, D. (2014). Endless Question: Endless Questions: How to think while playing. Retrieved November 1, 2019, from Endless Question: Youth Becomings and the Anti-Crisis of Kids in Global Japan website: http://scalar.usc.edu/students/endlessquestion/index
Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10.
Ellingson, L. L. (2014). “The truth must dazzle gradually”: Enriching relationship research using a crystallization framework. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514523553
Farrow, R. (2016). Constellations of openness In M. Deimann & M. Peters, (Eds.). In The philosophy and theory of open education. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Federman, M. (2004, July 23). What is the Meaning of The Medium is the Message? Retrieved November 13, 2019, from The McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology website: http://individual.utoronto.ca/markfederman/article_mediumisthemessage.htm
Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.
Freire, P. (2009). From pedagogy of the oppressed. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 2(2), 163–174.
Gallagher, T., & Rowsell, J. (2017). Untangling Binaries: Where Canada sits in the “21st century debate.” McGill Journal of Education, 52(2), 383–407.
Gatin, G. (2013). Keeping your distance. Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 9–25.
Gee, J. P. (2015). Literacy and education. New York: NY: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2017). Teaching, learning, literacy in our high-risk high-tech world: A framework for becoming human. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Giroux, H. A. (2010). Lessons from Paulo Freire. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(9), B15–B16.
Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. (Eds.). (2012). Literacy in the Digital University: Learning as Social Practice in a Digital World. London, UK: Routledge.
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your "house”. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12–26.
Green, C. (2019, November 28). A coalition to support implementation of the UNESCO OER recommendation. Retrieved from Creative Commons website: https://creativecommons.org/2019/11/28/coalition-to-support-unesco-oer-recommendation/
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Gupta, S. (2017). Ethical Issues in Designing Internet-Based Research: Recommendations for Good Practice. Journal of Research Practice, 13(2), 1–14.
Hadziristic, T. (2017). The state of digital literacy in Canada: A literature review. Retrieved from Brookfield Institute for Innovation + Entrepreneurship website: https://brookfieldinstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/BrookfieldInstitute_State-of-Digital-Literacy-in-Canada_Literature_WorkingPaper.pdf
Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of Open Pedagogy: A Model for Using Open Educational Resources. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 11.
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Retrieved from http://stc2.uws.edu.au/CRproj/Ethnographic_Strategies.pdf
Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to Learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hoechsmann, M., & DeWaard, H. (2015). Mapping digital literacy policy and practice in the Canadian education landscape. Retrieved from Media Smarts Canada website: http://mediasmarts.ca/sites/mediasmarts/files/publication-report/full/mapping-digital-literacy.pdf
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, danah, Cody, R., Herr-Setphenson, B., … Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Retrieved from https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/files/Hanging_Out.pdf
Jacobs, D. T. (2008). The authentic dissertation: Alternative ways of knowing, research, and representation. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3717886/The_Authentic_Dissertation_-_Alternative_ways_of_knowing_research_and_representation
Jaipal-Jamani, K., Figg, C., Collier, D., Gallagher, T., Winters, K., & Ciampa, K. (2018). Developing TPACK of university faculty through technology leadership roles. Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/984
Jolls, T., & Johnsen, M. (2018). Media literacy: A foundational skill for democracy in the 21st century. HeinOnline.
Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2063–2079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815577797
Kim, D. (2018). A framework for implementing OER-based lesson design activities for pre-service teachers. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4).
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.). (2007). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Law, N., Woo, D., de la Torre, J., & Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf
Lemos, G., & Nascimbeni, F. (2016). ELINET position paper on digital literacy. Retrieved from European Literacy Policy Network website: http://www.eli-net.eu/fileadmin/ELINET/Redaktion/Amsterdam_conference/ELINET_Position_Paper_on_Digital_Literacy.pdf
Lohnes Watulak, S. (2016). Reflection in action: Using inquiry groups to explore critical digital literacy with pre-service teachers. Educational Action Research, 24(4), 503–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1106957
Lohnes Watulak, S. (2018). Making space for preservice teacher agency through connected learning in preservice educational technology courses. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(3), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1453894
Lowenthal, P., & Muth, R. (2009). Constructivism. In E. F. Provenzo Jr. & A. B. Provenzo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Social and Cultural Foundations of Education (pp. 178–179). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lakeheadu.ca/10.4135/9781412963992.n86
Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(4), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
Luttrell, W. (2000). “Good enough” methods for ethnographic research. Harvard Educational Review, 70(4), 499.
Markham, A. (2016, January 20). Ethnography in the digital internet era: From fields to flows, descriptions to interventions [Online article]. Retrieved from http://jeremydean.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ethnographyinthedigitalera2016finaldraft.pdf
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0) [AOIR Ethics Working Committee]. Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
Markham, A. N. (2008). Internet in qualitative reseearch. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 455–458). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n231
McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1992). Laws of media: The new science. Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/e/ec/McLuhan_Marshall_McLuhan_Eric_Laws_of_Media_The_New_Science.pdf
Montoya, S. (2018, September 12). Meet the SDG 4 data: Indicators on school conditions, scholarships and teachers. Retrieved from UNESCO.org website: http://uis.unesco.org/en/blog/meet-sdg-4-data-indicators-school-conditions-scholarships-and-teachers
Nascimbeni, F. (2016, February 23). The open educators factory (OEF) project. Retrieved May 24, 2019, from Open Education Working Group website: https://education.okfn.org/the-open-educators-factory-oef-project/
Nascimbeni, Fabio. (2018). Rethinking digital literacy for teachers in open and participatory societies. Research Gate. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDLDC.2018070101
Nascimbeni, Fabio, & Burgos, D. (2016). In search for the open educator: Proposal of a definition and a framework to Increase openness adoption among university educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2736
Noddings, N., & Scott Enright, D. (1983). The promise of open education. Theory into Practice, 22(3), 182–189.
Oddone, K. M. (2019). Teachers’ Experience of Professional Learning Through Personal Learning Networks (PhD, Queensland University of Technology). https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.127928
OECD. (2018). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Retrieved July 21, 2019, from OECD Publishing, Paris, France website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. Retrieved May 26, 2019, from http://www.papert.org/articles/SituatingConstructionism.html
Paskevicius, M. (2017). Conceptualizing open educational practices through the lens of constructive alignment. Open Praxis, 9(2), 125–140.
Paskevicius, M. (2018). Exploring educators experiences implementing open educational practices (University of Victoria). Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uvic.ca//handle/1828/10414 https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/CA77BB
Petrarca, D., & Kitchen, J. (2017). A time of change in Ontario’s initial teacher education. In D. Petrarca & J. Kitchen (Eds.), Initial teacher education in Ontario: The first year of four-semester teacher education programs. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-36OcipMmoPU2kyNzJ0ZWU1WlE/view
Phuong, T. T., Cole, S. C., & Zarestky, J. (2018). A systematic literature review of faculty development for teacher educators. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 373–389.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Pink, Sarah. (2015). Going forward through the world: Thinking theoretically about first person perspective digital ethnography. Integrative Psychological & Behavioural Studies, 49(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9292-0
Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, (145), 123.
Research Council of Canada. (2014). Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html
Roberts, V., Blomgren, C., Ishmael, K., Graham, L., & Ferdig, R. E. (2018). Open educational practices in K-12 online and blended learning environments. In K. Kennedy (Ed.), Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning (2nd ed., pp. 527–544). Retrieved from https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/Handbook_of_Research_on_K-12_Online_and_Blended_Learning_Second_Edition_/6686813
Roberts, Verena. (2019). Open educational practices (OEP): Design-based research on expanded high school learning environments, spaces, and experiences (Doctoral, University of Calgary). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/110926/ucalgary_2019_roberts_verena.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y
Rogow, F. (2019). Media resource review: Crash course in media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 11(1), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2019-11-1-7
Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: Staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20(0). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14395
Rolfe, V. (2017). Striving Toward Openness: But What Do We Really Mean? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 75–88.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seko, Y., & Lewis, S. (2017). “We tend to err on the side of caution”: Ethical challenges facing Canadian research ethics boards when overseeing internet research. In M. Zimmer & K. Kinder-Kurlanda (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics for the Social Age (pp. 133–150). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Seward, T. P., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). The digital imperative in the 21st century classroom: Rethinking the teacher-learner dynamic. Issues in Teacher Education, 28(1), 80–98.
Siemens, G. (2012). Orientation: Sensemaking and wayfinding in complex distributed online information environments (Doctoral, University of the Highlands and Islands). Retrieved from https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/portal/files/3077978/George_Siemens_thesis.pdf
Spante, M., Sofkova Hashemi, S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
Stagg, A. (2017). The ecology of the open practitioner: A conceptual framework for open research. Open Praxis, 9(4), 363–374.
Stewart, B. (2015). In Abundance: Networked Participatory Practices as Scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2158/3343?utm_content=buffer4b8c7&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Stewart, H., Gapp, R., & Harwood, I. (2017). Exploring the alchemy of qualitative management research: Seeking trustworthiness, credibility and rigor through crystallization. The Qualitative Report, 22(1), 1–19.
Stokes-Beverley, C., & Simoy, I. (2016). Advancing educational technology in teacher preparation: Policy brief (pp. 1–22). Retrieved from Department of Educational Technology website: https://tech.ed.gov/files/2016/12/Ed-Tech-in-Teacher-Preparation-Brief.pdf
Stordy, P. H. (2015). Taxonomy of literacies. Journal of Documentation, 71(3), 456–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2013-0128
Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143
USC: Learning and Teaching. (2014). Overview of connectivism—Dr. George Siemens. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yx5VHpaW8sQ
van Merrienboer, J., & Sweller, J. (n.d.). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1313/2304
Voithofer, R., Nelson, M., Han, G., & Caines, A. (2019). Factors that influence TPACK adoption by teacher educators in the US. Education Technology Research Development, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09652-9
Watt, D. (2007). On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. The Qualitative Report, 12(1), 82–101.
Watt, Diane. (2019). Video production in elementary teacher education as a critical digital literacy practice. Media and Communication, 7(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1967
Weller, M. (2014). The Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory – Martin Weller [Online book]. Retrieved February 5, 2018, from Ubiquity Press website: https://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/books/10.5334/bam/read/#epubcfi(/6/2[cover.xhtml]!/4/1:0)
Weller, M. (2016, December 13). The paradoxes of open scholarship – The Ed Techie. Retrieved May 9, 2018, from http://blog.edtechie.net/openness/the-paradoxes-of-open-scholarship/
West-Puckett, S., Smith, A., Cantrill, C., & Zamora, M. (2018). The Fallacies of Open: Participatory Design, Infrastructuring, and the Pursuit of Radical Possibility. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 18(2), 203–232.
Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Springer.
Winthereik, B. R., & Verran, H. (2012). Ethnographic stories as generalizations that intervene. Science Studies, 25(1), 37–51.
Woloshyn, V. E., Kaefer, T., Savage, M., & Ratkovic, S. (2017). Exploring research methodologies: Mapping the Canadian education landscape as represented through two national journals. In S. Opic, B. Bognar, & S. Ratkovic (Eds.), New Approaches to Research Methodology in Education (pp. 223–266). Zagreb: Faculty of Teacher Education: University of Zagreb.