Into the Labyrinth : A PhD Comprehensive Portfolio

The Center of the Labyrinth

I now stand in the center of the Joint PhD program, metaphorically at the center of the labyrinth. I have explored the path taken to arrive here. I can look forward to the steps yet to be taken. As I stand here, I reflect on the transformative 'technological embodiment' and 'creative material engagement' (Idhe & Malafouris, 2019) that has shaped my becoming as a researcher, an academic, and a PhD candidate. Ihde and Malafouris posit that "the difference that makes the difference is the recursive effect that the things we make and our skills in making seem to have on human becoming". By doing research, by writing, by enacting academic enquiry, I am shaped by the making and doing, by the creating and thinking, and by the practice and experience. In turn, the academic and scholarly landscape is being shaped by my making. This intertwining of the cognitive and material cultures in my academic and scholarly work are inextricably intertwined with interactions and relationships, both human and technical (Ihde & Malafouris, 2019). I offer this moment of reflection in action, this transformative becoming, as verification of my extended theoretical, conceptual, and methodological analysis within the field of Cognition and Learning. 

Arrival at the center is the opportunity to commit to the new phase, the return commences it. Senn (2002)

First, I will present a literature review for the proposed research. While this is not the research proposal that will be submitted to my committee for formal approval, it will frame my inquiries in current research in the field of study. Secondly, it will reveal the theoretical and conceptual frameworks by exploring my ontology, epistemology, methodology, methods, validity, and authenticity. The final section of this centering process is where I will share the alternate dissertation (AltDiss) format used here in this comprehensive portfolio and proposed for use in the dissertation. 

Literature review structure
  1. Intro and rationale
  2. Purpose
  3. Glossary of terms
  4. Research questions 
  5. Positionality
  6. Theoretical framework
  7. Conceptual framework
    • Literacies
    • Teacher education
    • Open educational practices
  8. Summary and next steps
Research Framework
  1. Methodology
  2. Methods
  3. Ethics
  4. Validity and Trustworthiness
Alternative Dissertation Framework 
  1. Purpose
  2. Process
References

Ihde, D., & Malafouris, L. (2019). Homo faber revisited: Postphenomenology and material engagement theory. Philosophy & Technology, 32(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7

Senn, C. F. (2002). Journeying as Religious Education: The Shaman, the Hero, the Pilgrim, and the Labyrinth Walker. Religious Education, 97(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344080290060897


 

This page has paths:

Contents of this path: