Into the Labyrinth : A PhD Comprehensive PortfolioMain MenuTable of ContentsHere you can see the linear construction of this comprehensive portfolio documentIntroductionThis is an introduction to me as an individual, a learner, and a teacherWelcome to the LabyrinthThis examines why this metaphor is applied to my PhD experience.Step By StepDescribing the process of moving into and through the PhD to this pointThe Center of the LabyrinthThis section lays out the path toward this point in time and the comprehensive portfolio.Conclusionfinal thoughts and next steps from this comprehensive portfolio productionReferencesThis is a full reference list for the comprehensive portfolio, also available in alphabetic notes.Appendicessupporting documents for this comprehensive portfoliohjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06
Conceptual Frameworks
12020-04-15T17:15:51+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea0616This is a page in the literature review.plain252020-04-24T20:27:49+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06Alternate Dissertation Format The conceptual framework is a logical structure applied to the theoretical concepts, assumptions and beliefs relevant to the research (Grant & Osanloo, 2014). The conceptual framework explores the methodology, methods, validity, and ethics sections as reflected through the theoretical lenses previously outlined. "Conceptual tools ... reflect the cumulative wisdom of the culture in which they are used, and experience of individuals. Their meaning is not invariant but a product of negotiation within the community" (Seely Brown et al., 1989). While the conceptual tools laid out for consideration in this comprehensive portfolio literature review are reflective of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks examined to date, I resist attempts to "impose a singe, umbrella-like paradigm over the entire project" since there is no unified qualitative or ethnographic distinction and the "ethnographer works within 'hybrid' reality" (Denzin, 2017). At this early stage of my Joint PhD research I attempt to "move forward into new spaces, into new identities, new relationships, and new radical forms of scholarship" (Denzin, 2017). With this being said, I now examine the methodology, methods, validity, and ethical considerations for my this PhD research. I explicitly examine how these align with the conceptual framework shared here.
This page has paths:
12020-01-11T18:00:42+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06Research Frameworkshjdewaard9This page outlines the basic conception of research frameworks.plain252020-04-28T18:31:47+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06
Contents of this path:
12020-04-17T20:18:03+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06Methodology1This is a subsection of the literature review.plain2020-04-17T20:18:03+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06
12020-04-17T20:20:29+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06Methods2This is a subsection of the literature review.plain2020-04-24T21:29:42+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06
12020-04-17T20:30:35+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06Validity = Credible + Trustworthy5This is a section of the literature review.plain2020-04-24T16:41:21+00:00hjdewaardc6c8628c72182a103f1a39a3b1e6de4bc774ea06